Public evidence and explanation

Publish enough to test the observation. Never publish beyond the evidence.

FASO’s proposed outputs are descriptive and non-prescriptive. Every published finding should identify its evidence, authority, confidence, limitations and publication status.

Publication principleFASO presents information and the evidence supporting it. It does not judge motive, assign blame or state conclusions beyond what the evidence supports.

Current publication register

Every publication carries an explicit evidence status, version and limitation.

The Research and Publications section is the authoritative home for FASO working hypotheses, proposed validation protocols and later findings. Social-media summaries must link back to the complete version.

Method published FASO-RP-001 · Version 1.0

Publication method · 27 July 2026

The Project FASO Research and Publication Method

The classification, evidence, versioning, correction and publication rules governing FASO research outputs.

Read the complete publication
Working hypothesis FASO-WH-001 · Version 1.0

Working hypothesis · 27 July 2026

From Instruction Attenuation to Operating-Regime Reversion

A testable hypothesis concerning abbreviation-induced semantic drift and the loss of an accuracy-governing instruction.

Read the complete publication
Working hypothesis FASO-WH-002 · Version 1.0

Working hypothesis · 27 July 2026

Evaluation-Induced System Drift

A testable hypothesis concerning continual evaluation, persistent feedback and change in either the system being measured or the validity of its measurement.

Read the complete publication
Working hypothesis FASO-WH-003 · Version 1.0

Working hypothesis · 27 July 2026

Cross-Model Evaluation Propagation and Multiplier Effects

A testable hypothesis concerning the lateral, stack-wide, institutional and generational propagation of evaluation-derived knowledge.

Read the complete publication
Protocol proposed FASO-VP-001 · Version 1.0

Validation protocol · 27 July 2026

Controlled Validation Protocol for Instruction Attenuation

A proposed experiment comparing absent, abbreviated, paraphrased, repeated and mechanically verified governing instructions.

Read the complete publication
Open the complete Research and Publications section

The publication promise

What was observed, how it was verified, what confidence is warranted and what remains unknown.

Public output must be useful enough to support scrutiny and bounded enough to protect people, systems, confidential information and the integrity of the method.

01

Observation records

Bounded accounts of safety-relevant discovery, change, drift or supported system-boundary departure.

02

Evidence and replay demonstrations

Controlled artefacts showing provenance, time order, replayability and the formation of results.

03

Research and technical notes

Methods, limitations, open issues, architecture summaries and validation materials.

04

Independent findings

External reviews, validation reports, qualifications, negative findings and FASO’s separately identified response.

05

Institutional reports

Governance, funding, conflicts, corrections, annual activity and publication-boundary decisions.

Publication Boundary

Transparency is disciplined disclosure, not unrestricted release.

Designed for publication

  • Bounded system status and dated checkpoints
  • Method and governance summaries
  • Controlled evidence and replay demonstrations
  • Independent findings and limitations
  • Corrections and superseded positions

Held behind the boundary

  • Protected implementation logic
  • Personal, confidential or privileged information
  • Unsafe operational detail
  • Unresolved or unauthorised evidence
  • Conclusions the evidence cannot support

Current public position

Research outputs remain distinct from system evidence and future publication commitments.

Use the complete research register for current publications, or review the evidence register for the built system’s current status.