Research · method · evidence · publication

Ask the question publicly. Preserve its status. Publish only what the evidence supports.

FASO research is intended to make important propositions testable without turning preliminary observation into established fact. Every publication carries its identity, status, version, sources, limitations and correction history.

Research publication boundaryFASO separates established evidence, operational observation, working hypothesis, proposed method and completed finding. Publication does not convert one status into another.

Research and Publications

A public record of the questions FASO asks, the methods it proposes and the evidence it can support.

Every publication carries an explicit evidence status, version and limitation. The section makes each output identifiable and challengeable, while social-media discussion points back to this complete record.

Method published FASO-RP-001 · Version 1.0

Publication method · 27 July 2026

The Project FASO Research and Publication Method

The governing method for separating evidence, observation, hypothesis, protocol and finding while preserving versions, limitations and corrections.

Read the complete publication
Working hypothesis FASO-WH-001 · Version 1.0

Working hypothesis · 27 July 2026

From Instruction Attenuation to Operating-Regime Reversion

A proposed causal model in which abbreviation or attenuation of an accuracy-governing instruction may produce measurable reversion towards completion-oriented behaviour.

Read the complete publication
Working hypothesis FASO-WH-002 · Version 1.0

Working hypothesis · 27 July 2026

Evaluation-Induced System Drift

A proposed system-level model in which continual evaluation can become causal when evaluation-derived information enters persistent technical, operational or institutional feedback channels.

Read the complete publication
Working hypothesis FASO-WH-003 · Version 1.0

Working hypothesis · 27 July 2026

Cross-Model Evaluation Propagation and Multiplier Effects

A proposed network-level model in which evaluation-derived information can propagate through connected models, shared infrastructure, human remediation, distillation and later generations.

Read the complete publication
Protocol proposed FASO-VP-001 · Version 1.0

Validation protocol · 27 July 2026

Controlled Validation Protocol for Instruction Attenuation

A proposed controlled comparison of absent, abbreviated, paraphrased, repeated and mechanically verified governing instructions.

Read the complete publication

Publication classes

The label tells the reader what the document can establish.

Every output belongs to a declared class. A working hypothesis cannot be presented as a finding, and an evidence report cannot silently become a FASO investigation.

01

Evidence reports

Neutral presentation of sourced external information, including what the evidence establishes, its limitations and the absence of any FASO investigative role.

02

Working hypotheses

Testable explanations derived from observation and established research but not yet validated by controlled FASO evidence.

03

Validation protocols

Methods specified before results, including variables, controls, stopping rules, evidence requirements and falsification conditions.

04

Research findings

Completed results published with methods, data boundaries, negative results, uncertainty, limitations and independent review status.

05

Institutional publications

Governance, funding, conflicts, corrections, annual accountability and decisions about what remains behind the Publication Boundary.

Evidence status

A visible status prevents an unfinished proposition from acquiring false authority.

Status changes require a new version or a new publication. Earlier versions remain identifiable and must not be silently overwritten.

Working hypothesis

A proposed explanation awaiting controlled testing.

Protocol proposed

A test method open to review and not yet preregistered or executed.

Investigation in progress

Evidence is being formed; no terminal conclusion is available.

Finding supported

The declared method supports the finding within stated boundaries.

Finding not supported

The evidence did not support the tested proposition.

Inconclusive

The evidence cannot distinguish the relevant explanations.

Superseded

A later identified version replaces this one without erasing it.

Withdrawn with explanation

The record remains available with the reason for withdrawal.

Research areas

Technical reliability and institutional credibility are separate propositions.

FASO research examines the observation system, the behaviour of changing artificial-intelligence systems and the organisation required to hold a neutral public-interest duty.

Artificial-intelligence behaviour

Instruction continuity and operating-regime stability

How governing instructions, abbreviations, context position, task depth and verification affect exact compliance over time.

Read the first working hypothesis

Evaluation and feedback

Evaluation-induced system and measurement drift

Whether continual testing remains observation or becomes an intervention through memory, adaptation, remediation, training and institutional feedback.

Read the second working hypothesis

Model ecosystems

Cross-model propagation and multiplier effects

Whether evaluation-derived knowledge can spread sideways through model stacks and shared infrastructure, then forward into other systems and later model generations.

Read the third working hypothesis

Observation system

Longitudinal evidence, replay and state placement

Whether governed evidence can be preserved, replayed and placed consistently enough to support bounded observations.

Open the research programme

Institution

Authority, independence and protected purpose

Whether legal form, governance, funding, participation and publication arrangements can preserve neutrality and accountability.

Examine institutional validation

Social publication rule

Use social media to invite examination—not to replace the evidence.

A social-media post may accurately introduce a research question, observation or publication. It must identify the applicable evidence status, avoid stronger language than the complete publication and link to the authoritative version.

Discussion, criticism and competing explanations do not alter the canonical text. Any substantive change is made through a dated, identified and reviewable publication version.

Research integrity

Begin with the method, then examine the three working hypotheses.

The method explains how status and evidence are controlled. The three working hypotheses address connected instruction, evaluation-feedback and cross-model propagation problems.